I redesigned the job search and details experience to improve clarity and confidence

I redesigned the job search and details experience to improve clarity and confidence

I redesigned the job search and details experience to improve clarity and confidence

*NDA Notice

This project was completed under a confidentiality agreement. All details have been abstracted to protect proprietary information while preserving the integrity of the design process.

*NDA Notice

This project was completed under a confidentiality agreement. All details have been abstracted to protect proprietary information while preserving the integrity of the design process.

The Dish in One Bite

The Dish in One Bite

Project Overview

Project Overview

Problem

Problem

Applicants struggling to find suitable jobs on current platform

Applicants struggling to find suitable jobs on current platform

Business Goal

Business Goal

Increase qualified job applications by improving job details experience

Increase qualified job applications by improving job details experience

+Researching

+Ideating

+Testing

+Designing

+Researching

+Ideating

+Testing

+Designing

Results

Results

83% of users preferred the redesigned navigation and job detail layout

83% of users preferred the redesigned navigation and job detail layout

Ingredients for this Project

Ingredients for this Project

Project type

Project type

University project with sponsors

University project with sponsors

Product

Product

Website

Website

Time

Time

August - December 2025

August - December 2025

My Role

My Role

Lead UX Designer

  • Defined project strategy

  • Led research direction for the team

  • Facilitated meetings and interviews

  • Designed research-grounded mid fidelity prototypes

Lead UX Designer

  • Defined project strategy

  • Led research direction for the team

  • Facilitated meetings and interviews

  • Designed research-grounded mid fidelity prototypes

Qualitative research, user-centered design, prototyping, data analysis, literature review, leadership

Qualitative research, user-centered design, prototyping, data analysis, literature review, leadership

Skill

Skill

My team

6 UX Design students (2 sophomores, 2 juniors, 1 graduate)

6 UX Design students (2 sophomores, 2 juniors, 1 graduate)

My Team

Sponsors

Sponsors

Uline team (1 UX Designer, 1 UX Researcher, 1 Business Analyst, 1 Product Manager)

Uline team (1 UX Designer, 1 UX Researcher, 1 Business Analyst, 1 Product Manager)

User group

User group

Job seekers, including people looking for full-time, part-time, or internship positions

Job seekers, including people looking for full-time, part-time, or internship positions

Preparation

Preparation

What I did before finding solutions

What I did before finding solutions

I drove the team to define the right problem before moving into solutions.

I drove the team to define the right problem before moving into solutions.

At first, we thought that the project was a typical “improve the job search experience” problem. However, as we delved deeper, it became clear that the issue wasn’t about missing features or outdated designs. It was about how people could technically find jobs and what affects their confidence when applying for jobs.

At first, we thought that the project was a typical “improve the job search experience” problem. However, as we delved deeper, it became clear that the issue wasn’t about missing features or outdated designs. It was about how people could technically find jobs and what affects their confidence when applying for jobs.

They struggled to

  • Quickly scan through the website and understand what matters

  • Compare roles without repeatedly jumping between pages

  • Decide whether the role was worth applying for without reading everything

They struggled to

  • Quickly scan through the website and understand what matters

  • Compare roles without repeatedly jumping between pages

  • Decide whether the role was worth applying for without reading everything

Therefore, we stepped back and reframed the problem as

Therefore, we stepped back and reframed the problem as

How might we design a job search experience that supports fast scanning, clear comparison, and confidence decisions with less unnecessary effort from users?

How might we design a job search experience that supports fast scanning, clear comparison, and confidence decisions with less unnecessary effort from users?

How might we design a job search experience that supports fast scanning, clear comparison, and confidence decisions with less unnecessary effort from users?

This framing helped shift our focus in this project

This framing helped shift our focus in this project

What information is available to users?

What information is available to users?

How information is structured, prioritized, and consumed by users?

How information is structured, prioritized, and consumed by users?

I led the team to look outward with comparative analysis and literature review

I led the team to look outward with comparative analysis and literature review

This stage helped us recognize what the applicants already expect when using a career platform, including what feels familiar, what feels trustworthy, and where enterprise sites commonly break down. With this, we could avoid designing in a vacuum and assuming that current experience was wrong without context and norms.

This stage helped us recognize what the applicants already expect when using a career platform, including what feels familiar, what feels trustworthy, and where enterprise sites commonly break down. With this, we could avoid designing in a vacuum and assuming that current experience was wrong without context and norms.

Comparative Analysis

Comparative Analysis

I began the research phase with comparative analysis to step back and identify similarities, differences, and recurring patterns across career platforms before delving deeper into Uline's current platform in isolation. This allows me to make design decisions by benchmarking strengths and weaknesses, uncovering industry trends, and establishing a foundation for the rest of the research process. Our main subjects in this activity are:

I began the research phase with comparative analysis to step back and identify similarities, differences, and recurring patterns across career platforms before delving deeper into Uline's current platform in isolation. This allows me to make design decisions by benchmarking strengths and weaknesses, uncovering industry trends, and establishing a foundation for the rest of the research process. Our main subjects in this activity are:

Our Current Platform

Our Current Platform

Our Current Platform

  • Understand the existing pain points, usability gaps, and structural limitations of the current platform

  • Establish baseline for comparison

  • Understand the existing pain points, usability gaps, and structural limitations of the current platform

  • Establish baseline for comparison

Direct Competitors

Direct Competitors

Direct Competitors

  • Identify common industry design standards for career site

  • Investigate what competitor are doing well and where Uline's site falls short comparing to them

  • Identify common industry design standards for career site

  • Investigate what competitor are doing well and where Uline's site falls short comparing to them

Large Tech Companies

Large Tech Companies

Large Tech Companies

  • Explore current trends in career site design

  • See how large brands build trust and reduce cognitive load with clarity and professionalism

  • Explore current trends in career site design

  • See how large brands build trust and reduce cognitive load with clarity and professionalism

Literature Review

Literature Review

After understanding the competitive landscape, my team conducted a literature review to ground our direction in established UX principles and cognitive research.

After understanding the competitive landscape, my team conducted a literature review to ground our direction in established UX principles and cognitive research.

Human Behaviors

Human Behaviors

  1. Readability and Scanning

  1. Readability and Scanning

  1. Cognitive Load

  1. Cognitive Load

  1. Job Information Prioritization

  1. Job Information Prioritization

Design Principles

Design Principles

  1. Brand and Identity

  1. Brand and Identity

  1. Navigation

  1. Navigation

  1. Content

  1. Content

  1. Accessibility/Responsiveness

  1. Accessibility/Responsiveness

My secret spice

My secret spice

In this activity, I guided the team to approach research using frameworks from behavioral and cognitive psychology, including readability, scanning patterns, and cognitive load. I understand that the core of the design is still human; therefore, it is necessary to center on how people process information.

In this activity, I guided the team to approach research using frameworks from behavioral and cognitive psychology, including readability, scanning patterns, and cognitive load. I understand that the core of the design is still human; therefore, it is necessary to center on how people process information.

!

!

!

Limitation

Limitation

We found that what works well on other job sites isn’t always transferable to our enterprise system. Also, looking at those patterns alone wasn’t enough for us to explain where users were actually getting stuck. This was when the user interview came into play.

We found that what works well on other job sites isn’t always transferable to our enterprise system. Also, looking at those patterns alone wasn’t enough for us to explain where users were actually getting stuck. This was when the user interview came into play.

I conducted observations of the current user experience

I conducted observations of the current user experience

Once we had the external context, our team moved into testing the existing design. This mattered as comparative analysis and secondary research only told us what users expect in common, and usability testing showed us where those expectations break and what actually works.

Once we had the external context, our team moved into testing the existing design. This mattered as comparative analysis and secondary research only told us what users expect in common, and usability testing showed us where those expectations break and what actually works.

As users navigated the current site in our usability testing, we paid attention to

As users navigated the current site in our usability testing, we paid attention to

Where they paused

Where they paused

When they reread the content

When they reread the content

Where they felt lost or struggled

Where they felt lost or struggled

Any moments of verbal uncertainty

Any moments of verbal uncertainty

I made sense of what I had found

I made sense of what I had found

And as research piled up, feedback and insight started to feel scattered. Therefore, I discussed with the team and decided to do:

And as research piled up, feedback and insight started to feel scattered. Therefore, I discussed with the team and decided to do:

Persona

Persona

  • Frame “Who is this for?” in our discussions

  • Resolve conflicting feedback

  • Choose what needs focusing on during ideating and testing

  • Frame “Who is this for?” in our discussions

  • Resolve conflicting feedback

  • Choose what needs focusing on during ideating and testing

Journey Map

Journey Map

  • See the gaps in a more structured and organized way

  • Identify breakdown between step, which couldn't be explained on a single screen

  • See the gaps in a more structured and organized way

  • Identify breakdown between step, which couldn't be explained on a single screen

Affinity Diagram

Affinity Diagram

  • Give clear connection between the information we discovered

  • Group gaps, patterns, and flows collaboratively

  • Decide what actually needs our intervention

  • Give clear connection between the information we discovered

  • Group gaps, patterns, and flows collaboratively

  • Decide what actually needs our intervention

Cooking

Cooking

How I created the final solution

How I created the final solution

My cooking process

My cooking process

Moving to Mid-fidelity Designs

Ideating from Research

Testing early flows

Final Testing and Selection

Design Decision

Design Decision

1. Expandable Job Cards with Immediate Role Summaries

We introduced dropdown job cards directly within the search results so applicants can preview key details, including responsibilities, qualifications, benefits, pay, and location, without navigating away from the results page. This interaction supports fast scanning and comparison, reduces back-and-forth page loading, and aligns with users’ preference for skimming before committing to full details.

  1. Left-Side Filter Panel with Clear Label

Filters were redesigned into clearly grouped categories (e.g., Job Type, Location, Career Area) and anchored on the left side of the page. Keeping filters visible at all times reinforces user control, prevents disorientation during browsing, and creates a structured search-to-filter flow that users found more intuitive during testing.

  1. Related Jobs Module to Support Lateral Exploration

We incorporated a related jobs section within the job details experience to encourage comparison and continued exploration. Rather than forcing users to restart their search, this module supports natural browsing behavior and helps applicants evaluate alternatives without losing context.

  1. Limited Number of Job Listings per Page

We intentionally limited the number of visible job cards per page to prevent overwhelm and scanning fatigue. By introducing spacing, hierarchy, and breathing room between listings, the interface feels lighter, more organized, and easier to navigate, directly addressing user feedback about dense, text-heavy layouts, and endless scrolling feel.

Impact

Impact

83%

83%

Of testing participants preferred the redesigned design and navigation system

Of testing participants preferred the redesigned design and navigation system

Leftover and Lesson

Leftover and Lesson

What I learned

What I learned

  1. Stepped into a stronger leadership role

  1. Stepped into a stronger leadership role

  1. Became better at using research to decide what not to design

  1. Became better at using research to decide what not to design

  1. Worked within real enterprise constraints

  1. Worked within real enterprise constraints

  1. Became clearer about what I was doing and why, and more confident in deciding the next steps

  1. Became clearer about what I was doing and why, and more confident in deciding the next steps

  1. Designed with research and psychological principles instead of assumptions

  1. Designed with research and psychological principles instead of assumptions

What I would do with more time

What I would do with more time

  1. Test designs with real task scenarios, not just user reactions

  1. Test designs with real task scenarios, not just user reactions

  1. Measure time-to-understanding and scan efficiency

  1. Measure time-to-understanding and scan efficiency

  1. Explore edge cases, including very similar roles, dense job listings

  1. Explore edge cases, including very similar roles, dense job listings

  1. Create high-fidelity screens

  1. Create high-fidelity screens

Let's connect!

You're interested in what I did? How about a coffee chat?